tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14034177.post7304722820054500898..comments2023-08-13T22:09:52.445-07:00Comments on Another Day In The Code Mines: You're probably using "unsigned" incorrectlyMark Besseyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12091448340989293403noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14034177.post-543035128693914872022-07-21T04:28:47.191-07:002022-07-21T04:28:47.191-07:00I have exact the opposite belief: never use signed...I have exact the opposite belief: never use signed type unless the quantity we are modeling is signed by nature. Of course, turn on ALL the warnings and treat warning as error.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14034177.post-53595867628531426232017-01-10T12:01:56.164-08:002017-01-10T12:01:56.164-08:00I'm curious what your thoughts are on this art...I'm curious what your thoughts are on this article:<br />http://embeddedgurus.com/stack-overflow/2009/07/efficient-c-tips-10-use-unsigned-integers/<br /><br />He's very adamant about unsigned integers. Could you comment on why you agree/disagree with him?Tumbler Terrallnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14034177.post-45063923272913953752007-10-29T22:51:00.000-07:002007-10-29T22:51:00.000-07:00Yeah, good point. I should add that.Yeah, good point. I should add that.Mark Besseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12091448340989293403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14034177.post-85494317768757655512007-10-29T19:24:00.000-07:002007-10-29T19:24:00.000-07:00My most favorite subject: unsigned types; and no m...My most favorite subject: unsigned types; and no mention of the U suffix. Ugh. How depressing. - lanceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14034177.post-23858413919506775872007-10-28T16:31:00.000-07:002007-10-28T16:31:00.000-07:00This is totally about me, isn't it. :(This is totally about me, isn't it. :(She Fights Like a Girlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115915657408393557noreply@blogger.com